The Perfect Med Bag is One that Doesn't Fall Off a Cliff: A Combat Mass Casualty Case.

Military trauma provides a unique pattern of injuries due to the high velocity, high kinetic energy ammunition utilized, and the high prevalence of blast injury. To further complicate this, military trauma often occurs in austere environments with limited logistical support. Therefore, military medical providers are forced to learn nonstandard techniques and when necessary, practice a level of improvisation not commonly seen in other medical fields. The case presented in this manuscript is a prime example of these challenges. At the onset of fighting both the medic's rucksack, carrying with it the primary source of medical gear and the precious supply of cold-stored blood products are lost. The scenario was further complicated by rough mountainous terrain and a prolonged evacuation time. The medical provider was forced to utilize nonstandard devices such as an improvised junctional tourniquet which used a rock to focus the devices pressure. They also adapted their basic understanding of surgical procedures to conduct a vascular cutdown procedure for wound exposure and effectively pack an otherwise non-compressible wound to a major artery. Despite a significant loss of equipment, the medic and their team were able to successfully care for a number of patients in this mass casualty scenario.

Beyond the Brachial Plexus: Reapplication of the Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Upper Arm Fistula Surgery.

Patients requiring complex upper arm arteriovenous fistulas or grafts may not be suitable candidates for a single regional anesthesia technique and monitored anesthesia care because the necessary thoracic (T2) dermatomal area of the medial, upper arm remains spared by any solitary brachial plexus (C5-T1) technique. An infiltrative intercostobrachial nerve block can often be used in conjunction with a brachial plexus block; however, coverage may still be incomplete. This case report describes the use of a high thoracic paravertebral block in conjunction with a brachial plexus block to achieve adequate anesthetic coverage for an upper arm arteriovenous fistula creation procedure extending into the axilla. The result of this technique showed adequate coverage of the upper arm and demonstrates that paravertebral blocks are a reasonable adjunct for proximal upper arm arteriovenous fistula procedures.

Altered lower extremity biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during single-leg and double-leg stop-jump tasks: A bilateral total support moment analysis.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can lead to long-lasting biomechanical alterations that put individuals at risk of a second ACL injury. Examining the total support moment may reveal between- and within-limb compensatory strategies. METHODS: Twenty-six participants who were cleared to return to sport following ACL reconstruction were recruited. Each participant completed the single-leg and double-leg stop jump tasks. These tasks were analyzed using force plates and a 3D motion analysis system. The total support moment was calculated by summing the internal moments of the hip, knee and ankle at peak vertical ground reaction force. FINDINGS: Internal knee extensor moment was lower in the involved limb compared to the uninvolved for both tasks (17.6%, P = 0.022; 18.4%, P = 0.008). No significant between-limb differences were found for the total support moment. The involved limb exhibited an 18.2% decrease in knee joint contribution (P = 0.01) and a 21.6% increase in ankle joint contribution (P = 0.016) to the total support moment compared to the uninvolved limb in the single-leg stop jump task. INTERPRETATION: Compensation for the involved knee is likely due to altered biomechanics that redistributes load to the uninvolved knee or to adjacent joints of the same limb. A partial shift in joint contribution from the knee to the ankle during the single-leg stop jump task demonstrates a tendency to decrease load to the knee. Further studies are needed to investigate how these adaptations impact the prevalence of subsequent injury and poor joint health.

The Usefulness of Meta-Analyses to Hip and Knee Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive systematic reviews of results from homogenous or heterogeneous clinical trials, meta-analyses are used to summarize and to interpret studies. Proponents believe that their use can increase study power and improve precision results. Critics emphasize that heterogeneity between studies and bias of individual studies compromise the value of results. The methodology of meta-analyses has improved over time, utilizing statistical analysis to reduce bias and examining heterogeneity. With an increasing trend of meta-analyses in orthopaedic literature, this study aimed to investigate quality and clinical utility of meta-analyses for total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A systematic review of total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty meta-analyses in 3 major orthopaedic journals from January 2000 to August 2017 was performed. Three authors independently reviewed eligible meta-analyses. A quality assessment was conducted using the Oxman-Guyatt Index. Reporting quality was assessed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Two high-volume, fellowship-trained, attending surgeons specializing in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty independently, in a blinded fashion, reviewed 24 of the highest-scored meta-analyses. RESULTS: There were 114 studies meeting eligibility criteria, 25 published from 2000 to 2009 and 89 published from 2010 to 2017, a 3.6-fold increase. The mean Oxman-Guyatt Index score was 3.89 points, with 12 high-quality studies, 87 moderate-quality studies, and 15 low-quality studies. The mean PRISMA score for all meta-analyses was 22.2 points, with 79% classified as low to moderate. Only 23 studies listed the Level of Evidence, and 8 were Level-I studies and 9 were Level-II studies. Studies with >15 randomized controlled trials were associated with higher PRISMA and Oxman-Guyatt Index scores. In 12 articles, we were unable to decipher the types of studies included. Only 39.4% of studies showed the risk of bias. Of the 24 studies identified as high quality per the PRISMA statement, 71% were determined to be either clinically unimportant or inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: The number of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty meta-analyses has markedly increased over the past decades. The majority of published meta-analyses from 3 major orthopaedic journals were not performed in accordance with established PRISMA guidelines. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many published meta-analyses are low to moderate quality, and clinicians should cautiously draw conclusions from poorly executed meta-analyses.

Early results of displaced femoral neck fragility fractures treated with supercapsular percutaneous-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the preferred treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in select patients, although dislocation remains a concern. In some studies, the supercapsular percutaneously assisted (SuperPATH) approach has demonstrated early mobilization, short hospital stay, and low dislocation rates in primary THA, but there are little data on its use for fractures. This study describes the perioperative outcomes and early dislocation rate of SuperPATH THA for displaced femoral neck fragility fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of previous ambulatory patients with a displaced femoral neck fragility fracture treated with THA using the SuperPATH approach. Demographic data, time to ambulation, length of stay, and in-hospital complications during the hospital stay and follow-up period were recorded. Phone interviews were conducted to check for dislocations 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients were included with an average age of 75.0 years. Hospital stay averaged 5.5 days, and patients were discharged on average postoperative day 3.6. About 83.8% of patients were ambulatory by postoperative day 1, and 94.6% ambulatory before discharge. Twenty-seven percent of patients were discharged home, 46% to inpatient rehabilitation, 24% to skilled nursing facility, and 1 patient to hospice. At follow-up, there was no symptomatic heterotopic ossification and no infections. Thirty-two patients were available for telephone interviews at 1 year, with no dislocations reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort, the SuperPATH approach for THA appears to be safe and effective for use in femoral neck fragility fractures, resulting in early ambulation and a low dislocation rate.